Are You a Sports Fanatic?

For sports fanatics everywhere, the bar has just been raised. Apparently, some guy in Chicago signed a pledge, in public, saying that he would change his name to ‘Peyton Manning’ if the Bears lost to the Colts in the Superbowl. (For those of you who don’t know, Peyton Manning is the Colts’ quarterback.) Well, as many of you probably don’t know–because many of you probably don’t care–the Bears lost to the Colts in the Superbowl. The guy who signed the pledge attempted to make good on it. However, a judge recently ruled that he couldn’t change his name. His parents, apparently, are quite relieved.

You can read the full story here.

3 Months


So we went to see the pediatrician (actually it was a nurse practitioner) yesterday, L is now 16.5lbs and 25″ long. This places him in the 90th to 97th percentile. L also received his vaccinations. 4 hours after his needles (the poor boy received 3 of them) I was regretting our decision to immunize, he was inconsolable. After some Tylenol the redness and inflammation went down on his leg and he has been in a much better mood since. Everyone reassures me that he won’t remember this experience, good…but I will. Thankfully I haven’t paralyzed him or caused brain damage.

L is sitting up really well these days, he still slouches a bit but everyday he gets stronger.

Could Anyone Use This?


Ever since we bought our digital camera, which you have all been experiencing the benefits of through our blog, our film camera has sat dormant. Because we are happy with our digital camera, we probably won’t have much use for our film camera in the future. It would be a shame for the camera to age in our possession if someone else would put it to use. Thus, we would be willing to give it away–well, almost give it away–to one of our readers if one of them expressed some interest in it.

The camera is a Canon EOS Elan II. We bought it new several years back and have been its only owners. We were very happy with the pictures it took. It is fully functional and in excellent condition. You can read about its specifications here and here. We are using the lens we bought with the camera body, so you would have to buy a lens for it. As a quick check on eBay will show, it’s not worth a lot of money. If any of you are interested, make us an offer.

Boston-Salem Trip Part 1

So we drove into Boston yesterday to apply for L’s Canadian citizenship–yes, we’re trying to make our little American into a Canadian. We had a noon appointment at the Canadian Consulate. After that, we did a little sightseeing. The weather was sunny and mild, but a little windy.
Here Pam and L are standing in front of downtown Boston. (How’s that for a feeble attempt at humor?)


Along the way, we passed by The Carillon‘s Boston office. (Check out the name on the building. For our readers who are not familiar with The Carillon, it is southeastern Manitoba’s regional newspaper.)


L and I got our picture taken standing in front of the Stata Center on MIT’s (Massachusetts Institute of Technology) campus. How’s that for modern architecture?


After walking around MIT for a while, we took the subway to the Museum of Fine Arts. We really lucked out. We got there a few minutes after 4:00. When Pam went to buy admission for us, she was told that the museum is free on Wednesday’s after 4:00. Very cool! Here Pam is feeding L amongst some very old Greek pottery.


Here L and I are enjoying–well okay, I’m probably enjoying them more than L is–some Greek sculpture.

Boston-Salem Trip Part 2


Here L is enjoying his stoller while he gets wheeled through the museum. There were, of course, many other things to look at besides Greek pottery and sculpture. We saw some very cool Japanese artwork inspired by ancient basket-weaving techniques. We also saw paintings by van Gogh, Monet, Manet, Picasso, Renoir, and Rembrandt. After walking the museum for a few hours, we were ready to pack it in. On the way back to our hotel, we stopped by The Cheesecake Factory and ordered some take-out. Back at the hotel, we ate cheesecake while we watched the Mavericks trounce the Caveliers.


Today, after a lazy morning, we loaded the car and drove a few miles north of Boston to Salem, the sight of the infamous Salem Witchcraft Trials that inspired Arthur Miller’s Crucible. Salem was also a very busy port town from the time it was settled in 1626 until about a hundred years ago.

First Recording Session

So today L and I had a little fun with a microphone. L did some singing while I prompted him with some whistles and clicks. I apologize, in advance, for the static in the middle of the file–you may want to turn your volume down a bit the first time you listen. For those of you still on dial-up, I’ve also posted a lower-quality version of the file. The recording is about 40 seconds long.

Singing in High Quality (1.6 M)

Singing in Low Quality (298 K)

Enjoy. Shoot me an email if you have trouble opening the file.

Fun for Geeks

Some of you may have been wondering what L’s dad has been up to over that last month. Well, he’s been busy trying to survive another semester of grad school, one that’s quickly turning out to be more demanding than any he’s experienced so far. One of the courses he is taking this semester is called ‘Math Logic I’. It is, to use a variation of a common expression, kicking his backside.

Much of the material covered in this course overlaps material that is traditionally taught in the Math Department and the Computer Science Department. So far we’ve been exploring, in very abstract terms, what might be the limits on what a machine could compute. The results of this inquiry have interesting philosophical implications. I’ll spare you the philosophy lecture. What I will do, however, is share a bit about the part of the course I have enjoyed so far.

So far, we’ve discussed two very primitive sorts of machines: Turing Machines and Abaci (‘abaci’ is the plural of ‘abacus’). These machines can be thought of as primitive calculators; they can be programmed to execute various computations on numerical inputs. A Turing Machine can be thought of in the following way.

Imagine that you have a really long tape, one that is divided into squares of equal size (not unlike a roll of toilet-paper) and stretched out on the ground. Now suppose you have a little box on wheels that can move up and down the length of the tape one square at a time. Inside the box is a really little man with a pencil, an eraser, and a book of instructions. The instructions in the book read like the following: move one square to the left; if the square is blank, write a stroke; then go to instruction x. The box can only move one square at a time. The man in the box can only manipulate what’s on the tape in one of two ways: he can write a stroke on a square and he can erase a stroke that is on a square.

Now imagine you are given the task of writing up the instruction book for the little man. Different sets of instructions will make the machine do different things. Suppose you give the man in the box the following instruction: move one square to the right; if the square is blank, write a stroke and repeat the instruction; if the square has a stroke, repeat the instruction. This sort of instruction would make the machine write an infinitely long block of strokes–barring break-downs and the end of the world–extending off into the distance to the right. Other instructions are more practical. Suppose you wanted to make a Turing Machine that would calculate addition for you. You would write up some intructions for the man such that, when you made two blocks of strokes on the tape beforehand, the machine would go to work on the two blocks of strokes and, when the machine stopped working, the single block of strokes remaining on the tape would be the sum of the two blocks of strokes you wrote on the tape at the outset. Suppose you wanted to add 2 and 3. Before you started the machine, the tape would look like ‘_,_,I,I,_,I,I,I,_,_’. If you wrote up your instructions properly, when the machine stopped the tape would look like ‘_,_,I,I,I,I,I,_,_’. You could write up separate instructions for every two numbers you wanted to add, but that would be extremely time consuming. You would probably just be better off doing the calculations yourself. But if you could write some instructions such that, no matter what two numbers you “wrote on the tape” beforehand, the machine would calculate their sum for you, you would have a time-saving device.

As part of my homework for this course I’ve had to write detailed, explicit instructions for Turing Machines. I’ve written instructions for various Turing Machines: one that doubles the number of strokes on the tape, one that adds two numbers together, one that subtracts two numbers, and others. An abacus is a slightly different machine, one that has Random Access Memory. Again, I won’t bore you with the details. If you’re interested, ask me about it sometime. Working on designing these sorts of machines has been fun. If only the rest of the material in the course was as much fun.